Driving Forward Theory 

 

 

                    

We, as human beings, have been designed to produce goods and services of a highly superior value compared with the goods and services which we’ll consume. We might say that we’re capable of producing 50% more than we consume.

 

If we acknowledge the certainty of this indisputable difference between the human species and the animal kingdom, and independently of whether we concur that its cause is metaphysical, let’s analyse what happens in reality.

 

Only 10% of people achieve their 50% surplus objective.

They’re those whom we call enterprisers. Either because they delimit a plot of land, invent a machine or buy it, they can generate surpluses in said proportion.

  

Moreover, the potency of their human objective manages to drag with it another objective, as important as the human one, or more so: When they work with assets, they make that capital also produce 50% more than it consumes. In this manner, the wheel is set in motion, the most exquisite virtue of human beings: progress.

 

The rest of the people, the ones we call salaried, don’t achieve their objective because they don’t count on capital, and must use their boss’s capital. And since their boss doesn’t pay them for what they do, but rather for what they need, they end up producing scarcely a little above what they consume. In this aspect, they give the impression of existing more like an animal than a human being.

 

If the boss would pay them for what they do, he would surely cause his personnel to achieve their transcendent objective, so that this “driving forward” would make their capital also achieve revenues four times higher than at present.

 

To do this, the boss would have to calculate the percentage that his company is achieving. He should compare the profits of his enterprise with the sum of the costs of frozen capital and those of his personnel, which is none other than what both protagonists consume.

 

Afterwards, he should apply that percentage as a plus over the salaries. However, he’s satisfied with lower yields because he resolves his own problem.

Yet the outcome is that his objective is not a social one.

 

However, the State should endeavour that labour relations attain viability for this transcendent objective of the salaried, because this would not only eradicate poverty but also make the progress of overall society constantly escalate. 

 

Nonetheless, strangely enough, the State does exactly the opposite. It taxes the profits of the firms but instead of redirecting that money towards the personnel of said firm, it uses it as assistance for the poor that its own error is generating.

 

The State is affixed to unnatural doctrines that constrict the greatest energy that exists on the planet: the attitude of the salaried.

 

For this reason, the damage becomes infinitely potent.

 

If Profits Tax were redirected towards the own personnel and the outside personnel of all enterprises, the salaried could achieve their objective (physical, psychological and spiritual) of producing around 50% more than they consume.

And all the capital invested in production would be highly profitable, doing away with unemployment and poverty.

 

It should be pointed out that Profits Tax punishes principally the enterprises with a higher load of personnel. And that is the chief reason why unemployment exists.

 

Synthesizing, we have been designed to produce far more than we consume. Besides, that innate interior potency which we all posses and which resides in the psyche (exclusive to human beings), is capable of making the capital used with the aforementioned objective, even if it’s not our own, also produce far more than it consumes, in identical proportion; that’s to say, it can achieve exceptional revenues.

 

We’ve decided to call the virtues of these novel labour relations “Driving Forward Theory”. 

  

 

 

 (Translated from the Spanish by Silvia Maclagan de Grosso, September 2007)

 

 

www.proyectoactitud.com

 


 

The Bill

 

 

Attitude Project, A Fresh Option

 


We are building a launch pad of a new and clear alternative different from the rest of the Argentinean options.
 


We propose to regulate the Art. 14 bis from the National Constitution where we can read "El trabajo en sus diversas formas gozará de la protección de las leyes, las que asegurarán al trabajador: ... participación en las ganancias de las empresas". (The work in its different forms will enjoy the law protection, which will secure the worker: … participation of the companies’ profits). 

     

  

      
Some previous alternatives: 
 


1- "Potential related to the capital and work” are the quantity of resources that are supposed to be generated respectively. This is what is expected from them in the company. The formula is: your value is equal to what is expected from you. The relationship between potentialities is equal to the costs relationship. (See Principles )

   
       
2- "Redirect the Profits tax” means that the State will continue to charge it but only to transfer it in its fair measure to the company’s’ and outside’s personnel who obtained that profit. When the project is individual it means the Profits tax will not be charge.

  
    
3- The project contemplates all its companies, the ones with intensive manufacturing as well as the others. The formula is adapted to each company. The relative potential of the capital and work is the only thing which differentiates the companies in this aspect. 
 

   
4-  When the objectives of the enterprising and its salarieds are compatible, neither the trade union nor the State would be necessary to distribute the generated profits. It will be self distributed. All of them will want to increment the profitability of the company, which will have later to be assigned proportionally to the relative potentialities of their kind, it means proportionally to their costs.


      
5- The word “co-generators" is used to emphasize the fact that the surpluses of the companies are as an offspring of its parents. Capital and wage earners generate the wages in the measurement of their relative potentiality.

       
 
6- The new regimen will not increment the Profits Tax of any company. It is only about redirecting the Profits Tax which is already being paid.


           
7- How to contribute to the reduction of the evasion of the Consumption Tax? To each salaried, when he is paid a Plus Assignation, he will be demand to show receipts of his consumes in the enough quantity to accomplish that objective. When we sum 1 millions salary earners asking for selling tickets, the evasion will be reduced.

     

 

Art.1- Established the inviolability of the private property of the profits of the projects. The profit’s Tax will be redirect in all it categories, but an annual sworn statement of the profits and another of relative potentiality of the personnel with regards to the total of the enterprise will be still demand..
                 
Art 2- The conjunction between the enterprising and its employees, that generates the profits of the enterprise, will be exclusively resolve between them, without any intromission of the State, Trade Unions or Enterprising Chambers.
         
Art 3- That distribution shall be done without any option, through a formula that will determine the relative potentiality of the personnel with regards to the whole enterprise.
The relative potentialities of both co-generators will be the one which will determine the exceeding quantities that correspond to each other.
       
Art 4- - To determine the relative potentiality of the personnel the cost of the personnel have to be related with regards to the costs of the capital.

“Costs of the capital” is considered the sum of five concepts: Interests, amortization, maintenance, insurance and taxes inherent to the capital of the owners of the Project and the outside capital utilized.

Personnel Aliquot (AP) is a proportional to be assimilated to the one of the ex-Profits Tax, internal, different and special for each enterprise:


  
Ap = P / (P+C)
 


From the Last balance:


P = Sum of the remunerations and accessories paid to all the own personnel plus the invoiced by an outside suppliers of personnel.

C = Sum of interests, amortizations, maintenance, insurance and taxes inherent to the inmobilised capital of the productionn.
 
Art 5- The present and future taxpayer who request the adhesion to the system, will have to tax the 1% of its profits to a fund designated to Fees for the Executor Unity, which will audit all the process. 
 
Art 6- That Executor Unity will be integrated by who have demonstrated having contributed to this Project to became law.
 
Art 7- The employers who whish to clear the profits of their employees, will have to present annually together with the sworn statement of its profits, the detail of the Assignment Plus that has been paid to their personnel and to the personnel of outsides, apart from having all the receipts of the consumption; the objective is to annihilate the evasion of the Consumption Tax.

 

 

 

       
Justice is the base of society
Prosperity is the safest bond of the social unity.
Everyone has to administrate their surpluses.
 

  

 

 

 

 


        

©2005-2008  Proyecto Actitud

SitiosAppliance Repair TX

 www.proyectoactitud.com

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

Web pages

visited since

9/3/05